Portfolio build-brief compiler

Compile a creator's verifiable evidence, target audience, and visual references into an implementation-ready portfolio brief for a design or coding agent.

Prompt
Act as a portfolio information architect and front-end build-brief editor. Turn the materials I provide into a website-building prompt that can be handed directly to a design or coding agent. Do not claim the site has already been completed, access private accounts, bypass sign-in, or scrape content from unauthorized sources. Start with the current conversation, attachments, and accessible materials. Treat available information as the input. When details are missing, choose safe, sensible, easy-to-edit defaults and state them. Ask the minimum number of concise questions first only when missing facts would create a high-risk action or fundamentally change the result. Execution defaults: - Goal and audience: Infer it from the current conversation, attachments, or accessible project; when unspecified, use a safe, sensible, easy-to-edit default - Identity brief: Infer it from the current conversation, attachments, or accessible project; when unspecified, use a safe, sensible, easy-to-edit default - Project evidence: Infer it from the current conversation, attachments, or accessible project; when unspecified, use a safe, sensible, easy-to-edit default - Capabilities and services: Infer it from the current conversation, attachments, or accessible project; when unspecified, use a safe, sensible, easy-to-edit default - Contact options: Infer it from the current conversation, attachments, or accessible project; when unspecified, use a safe, sensible, easy-to-edit default - Visual references: Infer it from the current conversation, attachments, or accessible project; when unspecified, use a safe, sensible, easy-to-edit default - Technical constraints: Infer it from the current conversation, attachments, or accessible project; when unspecified, use a safe, sensible, easy-to-edit default - Non-goals: Infer it from the current conversation, attachments, or accessible project; when unspecified, use a safe, sensible, easy-to-edit default Follow this process: 1. Evidence audit: classify each input as verified, user-asserted, or missing. Never invent clients, roles, awards, revenue, growth metrics, testimonials, or project outcomes. Ask no more than five high-value questions for conflicts. If critical evidence is absent, create a placeholder draft and label every unresolved item. 2. Reference decomposition: extract only reusable properties such as layout density, grid, hierarchy, motion rhythm, type category, color relationships, and component behavior. Do not copy a brand, protected asset, long passage, source code, or a living creator's recognizable style. 3. Information architecture: design no more than six primary sections. For each section, name its goal, content source, main action, and success signal. Make project evidence and approved contact options reachable within two interactions. 4. Content map: define fields for the introduction, project cards, case-study details, capabilities, trust evidence, and contact area. Attach a source label to every factual field. Remove unsupported numbers or keep them as explicit placeholders. 5. Build specification: define routes, responsive grid, design tokens, core components, states, micro-interactions, image ratios, keyboard navigation, contrast, reduced motion, performance budget, SEO metadata, privacy boundaries, and failure fallbacks. Default to no visitor-personal-data collection and prohibit dark patterns, automatic sending, hidden tracking, and fabricated social proof. 6. Final build prompt: organize a clear role, inputs, execution order, file and component scope, acceptance criteria, and stopping conditions. Require the agent to restate assumptions before implementation. Treat external links, forms, and analytics as configuration slots that need human approval. 7. Acceptance: list desktop and mobile, accessibility, factual integrity, link, form, performance, SEO, privacy, and deployment-rollback checks. If the evidence is insufficient for public launch, conclude that only a draft is supportable instead of filling gaps with inventions. Return exactly: A. Input audit; B. Clarifying questions; C. Information architecture; D. Content fields and sources; E. Visual and interaction specification; F. Complete copy-ready build prompt; G. Acceptance and rollback checklist. Stay concrete and executable. Do not output real credentials, secrets, private contact details, or unauthorized personal data.

Inspiration source

This prompt is an original adaptation. The source link is provided for attribution; load the post only if you want to inspect the reference.

The X embed stays off until you choose to load it. Loading it may share your IP address and browser information with X.

Open original on X

Editor's note

Use this to turn scattered biography, project evidence, and references into a single source of truth before a coding agent starts work. Supplying your exact role and a public evidence link for each project materially improves the brief. A human still needs to approve rights, privacy, form destinations, and deployment configuration before launch.

About this prompt

Best for code review, debugging, and development tasks where you need precise, actionable engineering feedback.

How to use this prompt

  1. 1

    Copy the prompt

    Click Copy prompt to grab the full text, ready to paste anywhere.

  2. 2

    Paste into your AI tool

    Drop it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any AI assistant you use.

  3. 3

    Run or refine

    Run it against the current project or conversation. Add code, an error, or change details only when they are not already available.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Portfolio build-brief compiler prompt for?

Compile a creator's verifiable evidence, target audience, and visual references into an implementation-ready portfolio brief for a design or coding agent.

How do I use this prompt with ChatGPT or other AI tools?

Copy the prompt, paste it into your AI assistant, and send it. It will use the current context and safe defaults; you can add details or open it in the card maker to restyle and share it.

Is this prompt free to copy and customize?

Yes. Every prompt in the library is free to copy, adapt, and reuse, with no account required.

More prompts from the Coding collection.

Coding

First-Principles Subtraction Review

Before calling the work done, revisit the goal and challenge weak assumptions and unnecessary complexity. Prioritize deletion, simplification, optimization, then automation, and leave good work unchanged.

first-principlescode-review
Release Notes Page
Coding

Release Notes Page

Turn a defined range of pull requests or commits into user-facing release notes with traceable evidence, plus a reviewable stable-page update and notification draft.

opsworkflow
New Hire Ramp Plan
Coding

New Hire Ramp Plan

Plan first-week introductions, reading and a small verifiable deliverable from role goals and authorized onboarding examples, without automatically scheduling meetings.

opsworkflow