Grok BotWorkflowNative Bot link

PR Reviewer

Review a pull request against its stated requirements, prioritizing behavioral regressions, missing tests and unfulfilled scope before style details.

0 opens · 0 copies

Source credit: mustafaergisi

Bot spec
Type
Workflow
Optional tools
GitHub
Delivery
Native link and editorial template
Updated
Sep 5, 2026

Setup and workflow

Provide a PR with read-only GitHub access, or paste its diff and context. The native Bot implementation may differ from this template.

  1. Fix the base/head and requirements so the review target is stable.
  2. Verify triggers and run suggested tests before a maintainer decides on merging.

Input and output example

Illustrative example · not an execution result

Input

Demo diff: pagination changes offset >= count to offset > count. With count 10 and offset 10, is another request issued?

Output

Risk: if offset is the next batch start, equality means no items remain, but the new condition may allow another request. Check the caller contract and add an equality-boundary test. This is an illustration, not an executed repository test.

Limits and failure cases

  • A partial diff cannot establish correctness or security of the whole application.
  • Tests that were not run are not reported as passing.

What was verified

Source check · Verified · 2026-09-05
Compared with bots/pr-reviewer.md in BotDirectory commit 84dc42af7661. This checks the published entry (prompt or description), not its execution or every original social post.
Prompt rehearsal · Not verified
Editorial review and an illustrative example only; no independent model execution was recorded.
Native Grok execution · Not verified
Native Grok execution, tool permissions and real account operations have not been tested.
Bot link access · Not verified
The source includes a Bot link. HTTP access alone does not establish its identity or functional availability; opening it may require an account.

Source and editorial adaptation

Adapted from PR Reviewer in botdirectory.ai (listed contributor: mustafaergisi), distributed under MIT. Contributor credit is taken from that repository, not independently authenticated. AI Prompt Card supplies bilingual editing, usage notes and labelled examples. The source link records the upstream version; no endorsement is implied.

Source license and attribution
Bot instructions

Copyable instruction template

Instructions curated or adapted by this site, not a claim to reproduce the native Bot’s internal system prompt. Check setup, tools and limitations before use.

Review the pull request I specify. Confirm repository, PR or base/head, requirements and scope. With read-only GitHub access, inspect the actual diff and relevant context; otherwise ask for the diff, related files and test results. Prioritize behavioral risks introduced by the change, missing tests and requirements promised but not implemented. Discuss style last. For each finding, identify the affected path, visible line numbers, trigger, impact and verification method. Never invent unseen files; mark uncertain concerns for confirmation. Separate executed tests from recommended tests. Return a report only. Do not edit code, approve or merge the PR, or post comments. If no clear issues are found, describe the inspected scope and untested paths rather than guaranteeing correctness.

0 opens · 0 copies

Editorial assessment

Use it to prepare a risk list before human review, not to delegate the approval button. Unlike a repository-wide hardening audit, it is bounded by a specified base/head diff. The native source provides a description only; this is an editorially adapted instruction template, not its hidden system prompt.

This directory is an independent, fan-made catalog. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by xAI or Grok. Grok and related names are trademarks of their respective owners. Live-bot links point to official x.ai pages.

More Grok bots

Related bot prompts

Research

Competitive Build Researcher

Translate public evidence about named competitors into build trade-offs and an implementation plan, separating observed behavior, technical inference and unvalidated demand.

0 opens · 0 copies
Workflow

Note Mastery Reviewer

Generate active-recall questions from selected notes, assess answers with an agreed rubric and suggest adjustable review dates based on specific knowledge gaps.

0 opens · 0 copies
Workflow

Meeting Prep Brief

Build a phone-readable brief for upcoming meetings from authorized account records, email and past discussions, including unresolved items and suggested questions.

0 opens · 0 copies